https://governmentscienceandengineering.blog.gov.uk/2018/11/12/thriving-not-surviving/

Thriving not surviving

Dr Patrick Vallance
Dr Patrick Vallance

Last week I chaired my second GSE Profession Board and secured two clear commitments for the year ahead that will help us drive real-world impact for members of the profession: Concentrating our efforts on delivering the ‘top three’ from our GSE profession Strategy, and overhauling our profession’s skills framework.

I want the future science and engineering stars of government to shine, and I will make that future a reality. I challenged the Heads of Science and Engineering Profession (HoSEPs) at the Board to set out a clear focus over the next 12 months that reflected a collective view of what GSE profession members see as immediate priorities.

Our GSE Strategy is comprehensive, but three key themes stood out as offers I want to quickly pin outcomes to, so that members of the profession will soon have a competitive range of services and products that reflect their needs.

Building pride

Firstly, I want to build pride in each member’s status as a GSE professional. In June, I wrote about my commitment to Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) across the GSE profession, and each member’s unique specialist knowledge and skills are part of that diversity that I will champion. I want to ensure the whole of government utilises the expertise that our members have to offer and its relevance to everything government does: from policy-making and operational decisions, through to driving and building our scientific evidence base.

This is a subject I advocate for across government, beyond the profession alone: A modern Civil Service is a scientific one. In turn, it’s important to me that each member feels fully part of the government family; and that they recognize and value the skills and knowledge they bring to the public sector, feeling able to put them to effective use.

Recognising excellence

Secondly, it’s crucial to me that members of the GSE profession are appropriately recognised for what they offer so that we attract and keep the right people, particularly in posts where there are currently critical skills gaps across government. So, I’ll be looking beyond government lines at how external organisations attract and retain high caliber scientists and engineers, so that we can compete accordingly.

I will also ensure that GSE profession members are recognised appropriately in other ways. This year alone, a number of individuals and teams who are part of the GSE profession were short-listed for the prestigious Civil Service Awards; make no mistake that just to reach the short-list stage is a very high bar indeed. I want these individuals and teams to be recognised for the value that their scientific expertise brings, and the importance of what they offer government.

GSE Strategy front page

Nuturing talent

My third priority is to nurture the talent, capability and skills of our GSE profession members. This area is particularly vast: we are, after all, a collective spanning a wide array of disciplines! But my focus here will include unique offers in areas such as apprenticeships and career pathways; ensuring that we provide a clear and tailored offer to GSE profession members that hones their core skills and knowledge, and gives them a route through the varied terrain (not to mention seniority levels) of government.

The GSE Fast Stream is another important feature in this priority area. I invited existing Fast Streamers that attended the GSE Profession Board last week to offer their thoughts on the scheme. We will set out a clearer learning and development offer for all GSE Fast Streamers, clearly linked to career pathways. Applications for the 2019 Fast Stream intake have just closed, but I will work with government departments to increase the number of places we offer in coming years.

Support for mentoring

I should also mention my commitment to promote and facilitate on-the-job personal development schemes such as mentoring and coaching. Both add value in different ways, with the former focused on the mentee’s own goals and aspirations, and the latter on the work goals of the individual being coached. I can speak from personal experience as a scientist of the benefits these bring.

I still have a mentor from my time as a medical student, and in my last role I found that having a coach really forced me to think about what I wanted to do, and more importantly, how I should do it. One caveat – my mentor who is well into his 70s still thinks I am a student!

Finally, I want the above priorities to be underpinned by an effective GSE Profession framework that sets out what skills the government needs from scientists and engineers. As such, over the coming months my team will redevelop the existing Science and Engineering Professional framework into a clearer and more accessible Science and Engineering Standards model, that GSE professionals can use to align to their individual career pathways.

So those are my commitments to you over the next year! I’d love to hear your thoughts so please do get in touch with me through the GSE Profession team: GSE@go-science.gov.uk


Sign up to the GSE blog to receive an email when a new blog is published and keep up to date with the work of the GSE profession.

3 comments

  1. Comment by Gareth Conway posted on

    Patrick; great blog and the engagement from people like you is so important.

    Though I'm a GSE member, I'm heavily connected to two other government professions. One of them (Policy) has broadly similar interests but it really suffers from not being able to understand it's 'flock' (i.e., members). It suffers as at the moment it doesn't accredit people in any way, and its members can move between policy roles and analogous ones (e.g., finance, delivery), so it is difficult to keep 'tabs' on where people are. The other profession I'm involved in is one of the other ones in the Analysis Function, which does accredit individuals.

    As far as I understand, being a GSE member is essentially self-certifying and signing up to the GSE distribution list. Clearly there are benefits for this - such as me being notified about your blog. However the challenges include not knowing about the membership, and others that I can go into elsewhere.

    Hence, can I ask, do you plan on bringing in some form of accreditation for GSE, or do you see this and the related issues (e.g., standards and assurance) as being a departmental issue, which HoSEPs are accountable for? If I've misunderstood anything - then my apologies in advance.

    Reply
    • Replies to Gareth Conway>

      Comment by Jenni Akers posted on

      Thank you for your comment Gareth. As part of the GSE Strategy implementation, the GSE team is looking to develop a tool to assist those GSE members that want to pursue accreditation in a particular area. May I also point you in the direction of the GSE Skills Framework.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-science-and-engineering-skills-framework, which we are looking to review shortly. Please get in touch with the GSE team if you would like to find out more: GSE@go-science.gov.uk

      Reply
      • Replies to Jenni Akers>

        Comment by Gareth Conway posted on

        Hi Jenni;
        I mean within-government accreditation (rather than accreditation/chartership with external learned societies). You'll be aware that most (or all?) of the other professions in the cross-government Analysis Function does accredit people in this manner - GSE, GSG/GSS, GORS, GSR.
        Hence, I'm still keen to hear your view on the questions I posed.
        Thanks in advance

        Reply

Leave a comment

We only ask for your email address so we know you're a real person